Posts Tagged ‘beauty’

The living witch of Agnesi.

Today is Ada Lovelace Day, an international day of blogging to draw attention to women’s contributions to the fields of science and technology.  I am no scientist, but this post is in honor of all of the women who have pioneered new paths in traditionally male fields and done it with grace, creativity, and courage… including my mother, who became a doctor during a time when girls didn’t get get cards to that old boys’ club.

Math and science have been used for centuries to cast doubt on the possibilities of the divine, but in my experience the beautiful symmetries, paradoxes, and poetic mysteries of mathematics, especially as it blends with art and music, have pointed me ever more certainly in the direction of God.  The universe is fascinating not only in its striking visual beauty, but because of its inner-workings.  Invisible rules abound, waiting to be revealed in the (I confess) completely unintelligible language of math.  I don’t get it, and I suppose it’s not necessary that I do, but I always appreciate people who can help me to understand how this world fits together within itself, how I fit into it on a cellular and molecular level.  An atomic one.

When I was thinking about women in the sciences this week, I ran across a phenomenon, and a woman, I’d never encountered before.  The Living Witch of Agnesi is a mathematical bell-shaped curve, the equation discovered by a woman named Maria Gaetana Agnesi who lived in Milan during the 18th century.  The curve is cool, perfect, and beautiful – its formula describes asymptotic behavior, meaning that it gets ever closer to zero but never quite reaches it, until X = infinity.  I like that, the idea of something never quite reaching zero but always reaching for it.  It reminds me of God’s time, of kairos. I’ve been thinking about how Christians are supposed, in some way, to have asymptotic faith, a faith reaching for its ultimate purpose but living in the tense reality that this is not necessarily achievable in our own time.

109-111a

Maria was the eldest of 21 children in a wealthy, noble Milanese family, her father a professor of mathematics at the University of Bologna who recognized talent in his daughter.  Treated as a child prodigy, she was given tutors to learn Greek, Hebrew, Latin, French, Spanish, philosophy and science and presented speeches to her father’s assembled colleagues at his urging.  At age 20, Maria assembled these nearly 200 speeches and published them in Latin, the topics including philosophy, celestial mechanics, gravitational theory and elasticity.  As the oldest of her siblings, it fell to her to teach them, and so that year she also began to write a maths text for her brothers, a task that took ten years to complete and was ultimately 1000 pages covering arithmetic, algebra, trigonometry, analytic geometry and calculus, as well as infinite series and differential equations.  The brilliance of the work was Maria’s use of many contemporary thinkers and the integration of the ideas in a novel way that continues to impress scholars in our own time.  The pope appointed Maria to the chair of mathematics and natural philosophy at the University of Bologna in recognition of the work.

Maria is not the “living witch of Agnesi…”  She used the Latin word ‘versoria‘ for the curve she studied, meaning ‘a rope that turns a sail’. This ‘versoria‘ became the the Italian wordla versiera’, which means ‘free to move’. But the translator of her book, the Englishman John Colson, translated the word to ‘l’aversiera’, the Italian word for ‘witch’.  While the translation error is interesting, considering the fact that innovative, creative, and free-thinking women throughout history have been mistaken for witches, I’m more fascinated by the totality of Maria’s life and accomplishments than I am by an Italian-incompetent male professor of math.  That story seems stale.

When Maria’s father died, she was released from the responsibility of educating her brothers and sisters, freeing her to use her resources to help the poor in her city.  In 1759, she opened a home for poor, ill, and elderly and continued this work, living there amongst those she served, until her death in 1799, when she was buried in a pauper’s grave, having given away all she owned – aside from her talents for teaching, language, science, philosophy, courage, and generosity, Maria also spent her time composing lovely music.  This woman, a brilliant and cutting-edge thinker, managed to do something that few human beings accomplish.  She integrated her world, connecting not only the smallest, most invisible laws of science to one another for the benefit of academics and art but linking the intangible demands of her faith and reason for the well-being of her fellow human beings.  She not only circumscribed mathematical arcs but relational ones, and in the process created beauty and richness.  I pray that we all, women and men, can live in such a way.


You can’t go home again.

This is my spiritual autogeobiography, a reflection on particular places that have been significant contexts for spiritual or theological reflection in my life and how the physical world has shaped my understanding of my spiritual development.  It’s based on a piece of writing I was assigned this week, that I thought I would share here.

Somewhere in Canfield, Ohio, near Youngstown, there is a point in the woods where I first came to believe in the existence and power of magical creatures.  In the spring, the area is surrounded waist-high with a liquidy green plant whose name I never learned but whose smell is like lemons and soap and earth, a pungent scent I will likely never forget, one of those smells like the perfume of your kindergarten teacher that hits you in the face at the mall one day, slapping you gently back to the Letter People and your fifth birthday.  Walking away into the woods behind my grandparents’ house, a hiker finds herself slipping into a glen paved with large smooth stones covered in low heavy moss, the light in the afternoon sliding through the leaves of large deciduous trees and the small growth of old forests.  The peak of the point always reminded me, looking down on a winding creek pushing itself across gray and rust-colored clay, over fallen tree trunks, and around the layered detritus of leaves fallen years earlier, of the edge of the world. As a child, until I was about twelve years old, I would strike out for this point to abandon the jabbering chatter of my extended family, the discomfort of avoiding my creepy uncle, and the kerosene smell of the bonfire over which my grandma habitually spit-roasted entire lambs during our visits.  Over the river and through the woods, to Grandmother’s house we go… in my experience of my family, this song was sung in reverse.  At the foot of the trees overlooking the creek were little beds of luscious moss, and I routinely found myself nestled on one of them, legs crossed, the seat of my pants a bit cold and wet, mindlessly playing with the sticks and flowers there, closely attending to the tiny white buds poking shyly out of the bryophyta.  It seemed only reasonable that my tramping noisily along had frightened away all sorts of creatures, as I never saw any on these trips, and I imagined that more than squirrels and owls lived in that green space.  My family on that side is Irish, and I grew up hearing the songs and legends of the Old Country, most of which danced around the unseen reality of Little People, trouble-makers and blessing-givers for whom we left milk in bowls outside the back door.  I always thought that they would appreciate more than little saucers of fresh milk, that they would prefer to stay away from our loud house and fighting sounds, and so using the resources of the woods, built piece by tiny piece moss tables and sofas, miniature spaces for living, places I hoped would be signs of my benevolence, gifts for allowing me to temporarily rent their home-woods while escaping the madness of my family.  As I constructed these tree-homes, I dreamed of living there, side by side with the little people, thought of their little families, imagined they would appreciate visiting one another, comparing the variety of décor they had unexpectedly been gifted.  The complexity of greens and browns, of natural textures, of bounteous opportunity, could be perceived only with my face pressed almost entirely into the mosses and stones.  I found diversity, I found quietude, I found a brilliant hospitality there.  Resilience, too, when I carefully tore up pieces of moss and carefully replanted them, to find that they had rooted themselves the next day, looking for all purposes as though the sofas and tables had emerged silently out of the soil of their own accord.  Invisible, the leprechauns were present to me, and I kept with me forever an understanding that a perception of absence is not the same thing as actual non-existence, only the presence of mystery.

From the time I was eight, every summer my family traveled twelve hours to Topsail Island, North Carolina, leaving on my birthday and returning two weeks later.  Topsail is a little spit of island south of Jacksonville, named such because settlers there could spot the top-sail of a pirate ship before anyone on the coast.  Blackbeard supposedly used the island as a stopping point.  Those vacations to the island, with its warm sea-salt smell, boggy inlets, and wildly strange fauna were the first time in my life I had the feeling, “I am the shape of this place.”  Before picking up the keys to our rented house at the realtor’s agency those June Sundays, my dad drove us straight to the beach next to the Surf City pier, and my brothers and I would jump out of our Suburban, screaming and laughing, plunging straight into the Atlantic surf in our smelly car-clothes.  Covered in salt and sand-encrusted, we were entirely freed by the simple enjoyment of having found ourselves in the ocean.  The dunes at Topsail are protected, as years of construction and tourism have worn them away so that the homes are unprotected from the terrible hurricanes of the late summer, the native turtles finding no safe place to encase their soft eggs on a direct path to the sea.  The waters, cold so early in the summer, lapped up against the soft tan beach, leaving evidence of picnics and swimmers, ancient shark teeth and broken shells, purple and orange seaweeds dislodged from the deeper waters beyond the sandbars.  It was there, in that murky water, that I learned balance, literally, when my father taught me to surf.  It was there that I learned to take risks in the riptides, trusted to swim and body board alone in the heat of the sun while my family lingered on the beach, my body rolling with every third wave, pushed over the edge down under into the roil, where I could either find myself lifted out, up, into the air or slammed down into the sand, not knowing which way breath was.  It was there that I learned what it meant to absorb the spirit of a place from the very air, comfortable with the light breeze but also with the terrifying summer storms that raged up unpredictably at sunset, lifting struggling, sucking cochina mollusks out of the wet sand and throwing waves down beyond the edge of the normal tides.  It was there I found that beauty sometimes first requires the introduction of ugliness or fear before its full potential could be realized.  Nothing is so striking, so visceral, jolting, as red lightning over the surging, usually peaceful, Atlantic as the sun which had warmed my shoulders during the day settled over the horizon, sinking into purple oblivion and leaving behind uncertain waters and unpredictable footpaths.  I cannot escape this place, and honestly, I do not have any desire to escape it.  I carry Topsail with me everywhere, during the times when I feel entirely out of place, when I find myself doubting the possibility of the existence of meaning… I remember the heart-sense of belonging in the water, and I grasp again for at least a moment the knowledge that there are some things larger than self in the world, but shaped around and including that self, even when there is no possible way to be present there in time and space.

High school, only a little later.  The geography is not a particular place, but a way of being in the space.  Sam was a good friend, one of the only other kids my age in our small Midwestern town to whom I could relate.  We both, in the way of small-town kids everywhere, had only one goal in life, and that was to get out.  Sam ended up at Harvard, then Berkley.  I did not go so far and ended up having to come home after a year at University of Chicago.  But from sophomore until senior year, we dreamed together, with our matching SAT scores and Uncommon Application essays, of leaving where we were for something more interesting, creative, and meaningful than Bluffton, Ohio.  Unencumbered by the pressures of high school attraction, Sam and I comfortably and regularly met in the middle of town after sports and band practices, portable cups of tea in hand, and walked up and down the streets, talking about philosophy, God, music, art – the usual intense, angsty late-night teen conversations.  I remember one walk in particular in which we discussed the existence of God.  It was not brilliant, or especially interesting, but the deep questions we asked, the way we challenged one another to think creatively, even though they were questions asked for thousands of years by human beings across worlds and contexts, shaped my thinking from then on, through college and my twenties.  They still effect how I ask questions about the reality of God today.  Those streets, sometimes wet with late rain, sometimes cold and covered in autumn leaves, sometimes three a.m. dark, the sound of our shoes on the sidewalk and our voices reverberating down the road by the football field, were where I learned to ask about the meanings of things.  Side by side with my friend, tracking and circling around the same small-town roads and the same questions, I learned that it is acceptable, even necessary, to try out the possibility of new beliefs, systems of understanding, words for ideas, to do it out loud and in community, and to accept feedback.  When I think about doubt, when I consider questions, I think about those walks.  My questions happen in those streets with Sam, even a decade later.

Wendell Berry talks about “the intimacy the mind makes with the place it awakens in,” and there is one very significant place where this phrase takes me in my history.  It has nothing to do with nature at all, but with the worst parts of the city, the most awful parts of human community.  It has to do with violence.  My first full-time job was at a domestic violence shelter in Columbus.  I was responsible from 3:00 pm until 11:00 pm every weekday for the safety, well-being, and management of a house full of battered women and their kids.  I walked the perimeter and hallways of that shelter incessantly nearly every day for four years.  Its smell, of feet and fried food, cleaning supplies and hair oil, was the most comforting thing, because when I smelled it, I knew exactly what my responsibilities were.  The big square property was a safe haven in the center of a city I learned was dotted with terror, disappointment, anger, and sadness, living rooms and kitchens and bedrooms tainted by human error and destruction.  My work, while ranging across the shelter and across boundaries personal and physical in that building, centered on what we called the “crisis office.”  Here was the practical and emotional center of the work, where crisis calls came in, where relationships began.  There, I learned for the first time in my life about the complexities of evil and what it meant to sin, the difficulties of forgiveness and redemption.  One story in particular comes to mind, from the second year of my work there.  I was running my rounds upstairs where the client rooms were situated and heard, coming from room eight at the end of the hallway, a child’s fearful scream, then crying.  I approached the door and heard one of the young girls staying there with her mom say, “Mommy, I thought you said you wouldn’t hurt me anymore.”   Then, the unforgettable sound of flesh hitting flesh, then silence.  I remember just standing there, wanting to enter the room but unsure of how I was supposed to intervene.  In all honesty, I did nothing, other than making certain that I talked about our rules related to discipline and abuse in the shelter during house meeting that night.  I struggled for weeks with my own cowardly response, with the idea that someone seeking refuge from violence could perpetrate the same on her own child, on that child’s hope for future healing, and on the resources I obviously did not possess to think about and act against evil.  Over the next few years, as I witnessed the awful crimes, ungraspable in their magnitude and creativity, that human beings can perpetrate against those they claim to love – boot marks on women’s faces, bruises and scratches, broken bones and emotional wounds too deep to understand or name – I thought about what an all-powerful, loving God could possibly alter in this fallen world.  I was challenged, in that building, to come to grips with the mystery of a crucified Son and a Father who apparently colluded in his torture and death, with resurrection and wholeness, with the promise of salvation and redemption.  I wrestled with these problems in the literal faces of abusers who had themselves been violated by others and in the bodies of their spouses who would return to the abuse over and over again.  I fought with what it means to be a place of safety and security, a beacon of hope, in the midst of dirtiness, when that place itself may hold demons and fallen-ness, when it is not perfect, either.  I found that I could never go home again, spiritually.  That building, the lives that had intersected with mine there, changed my understanding of God forever, revealing a complex divinity whose power was not the power of bad fathers or even of loving ones, but of a different tenor altogether.  My mind awakened there to the real juxtaposition of goodness and sinfulness, sometimes in the same person standing in front of me with torn clothes and a battered suitcase, asking for help and about to rob the shelter blind of the food in its refrigerator.

The forest, escaping family din and reaching for mystery; the beach celebrating beauty and fear; familiar small-town streets alive with questions and dreams but without solid answers; the darkened, dirty hallways of an old town-house claiming to be a safe haven but holding badness in its walls; these are the places of my spiritual journeying and my life’s shaping.  There are more, of course, but these four tell a good tale and provide a foundation for understanding the way I am in the world today, in the heart of God and as a part of my human family.

Most courteously and most tenderly.

I’ve been submersed during the last month or so  in the writings of the 14th century English mystic and anchoress Julian of Norwich as part of a class I’m taking about her life and spirituality.  Every week as part of class, our professor opens a half hour for us to meditate through art on a passage related to our learning.  A few weeks ago, armed with my sketchbook and some borrowed crayons, I showed up to this late evening class feeling raw and open-nerved after a fourteen hour day, an emotionally difficult weekend, and heaviness in my heart.  I rolled my eyes and felt a sinking pit in my stomach when I read the two prompts for meditation: one was about Julian’s vision of the bleeding Christ on the cross and the other was about mothers.  I was unprepared on all levels to think about either my suffering Lord or his relationship to mothering, parenting, provision.  In a word, I was feeling oppositional.

But, I had to choose one, or sit in my uncomfortable chair with my arms crossed for the duration.  So I picked the second one, hoping that some sort of lovely feminist vision would come to me, edging into my consciousness and having nothing at all to do with my recent struggles to understand myself within a larger matrix of the story of my own parents.

So, I read and reread Julian’s gentle words, “The mother can give of her child to suck of her milk, but our precious Mother Jesus can feed us with himself, and does, most courteously and most tenderly…”  I thought about communion, and Jesus feeding us out of his own body.  I thought about the powerful experiences, at some times of total emptiness and at others of absolute peace and assurance, I’ve found eating at that table.  Finding sustenance there, despite my anger or doubt or conviction.  Then I read the rest of the meditation… “With what do you need Christ to feed you right now?”  Oh, no.  I very desperately didn’t want to reflect on that question.   But, actually, I didn’t have to.  I just began to color.  I need to engage some full disclosure here.  I have no artistic ability whatsoever.  None.  I appreciate beautiful things but don’t create them.  Especially with Crayola crayons.  But, keeping those words in my mind, “our precious Mother Jesus… feed you…,” here’s what came out:

Julian, Christ as Mother

I sat and watched myself draw this stunning, living woman, these gorgeous heavy breasts and tummy, this open posture and radiance.  And had no idea what the hell it meant.  But in order to honor Julian, you’ve got to sit with something for a while.  I mean, the woman had a vision of the Christ on the cross and meditated on it for twenty years before she wrote about it again.

My mother is not this image.  I don’t know this mother.  I know I want her to be mine.  What do I need Christ to feed me now?  This image tells me my heart is crying for comfort.  I want warm, luscious fullness.  Plenitude.  Her arms aren’t showing in the picture, but in my mind they’re plump and warm and full, and they’d probably fit right around me while I cry.  She’s peaceful, and that peace simply oozes out into the rest of the picture.  Christ is this woman.  He’s my mother.  I need one, right about now in my life, and this is the one I want.  Open, vulnerable, strong, and comforting.  Available, compassionate, and unafraid.  Thing is, I think I’ve got what I’ve been looking for.  It’s been there, in my heart, all along, just waiting for me to drop my defenses and pick up my yellow crayons.  I hope you find what Christ wants to feed you, too.  Amen.

Poetry is a mirror which makes beautiful that which is distorted.

Percy Bysshe Shelley once said, in defense of poetry itself, “Poetry is a mirror which makes beautiful that which is distorted.”  I wonder sometimes if this isn’t what theology is, the knitting together of brokenness, the picking up of various pieces of experience, some lovely, some jagged, others jarring and discordant, remaking it into something new.  Transformation.  Relearning to see and hear.  Feeling anew about things we’ve thought, unclenching our fists from around our grimiest, most treasured conceptions and opening them to new light.  The road leading toward the end of seminary seems strewn, more than ever, with obstacles to step around, scramble over, slash through.  I’m exceptionally tired.  Theology, or as it’s called sometimes, “faith seeking understanding,” doesn’t come much clearer to me now than it did two and a half years ago.  I’ve learned some tricks, most of which are short-hand for making beautiful that which is distorted.  I have to say, there are two that have saved me from throwing myself to the ground a couple (alright, more than a couple) of times and pitching an all-star temper tantrum in a fit of exhaustion and frustration with how slowly I seem to learn this stuff.  With how unwillingly I apply it to who and what I am to be and become in this world. 

The first: the ability to say, without evasion and summoning up as much wonder as I can muster, “It’s a mystery.”  Mysterion, the secret counsel of God, this is simply something I have been learning to accept.  Even more, to value.  Really, believing that there is mystery, a sacred thing that is beyond me to comprehend or appreciate, to dissect and label, this is a gift.  Because humility is a gift, and that’s what mystery casts upon us.  Well, on me, anyhow.  It is comforting sometimes to feel small, because that means that there is something much bigger than me, and It understands and sees what I don’t.

The second: the all-purpose question, “Where is God in this?”  Try it.  This is a question you can ask of nearly any circumstance, personal or global, terrifying, ugly, awesome, curious, paradoxical, lovely.  Where, how, is God in this?  It’s odd to me, but the question forces us to allow God back into the picture.  The question isn’t a lament, “Is God in this?” but a statement of faith… yes, God’s in here, somewhere, I just haven’t been looking well enough.  God isn’t hiding here, I simply need to crack open the heavy eyelids of my heart and actually try to see.  Distortion is the impermanent but unfortunate ruining, the altering, of something that is not naturally the way it’s being perceived at that moment.  With the right mirror, its beauty returns and it’s seen as it was meant to be.  How, that’s a mystery.  But it’s God’s mystery, and I’ll take it.

The spirit of discipline.

The list seems endless: prayer, meditation, fasting, journaling, “spiritual reading” (whatever that is), tithing, charitable acts.  Spiritual disciplines are so intimidating.  I googled “spiritual disciplines” and got 824,000 hits.  Just “prayer” got 88,700,000.  88 million people have written about prayer on the internet.  Each person has a different idea of what it means to pray, what it “does,” how it “works,” what the point of praying is.  You see, lately I’ve been realizing how hard it is to define what my own spiritual practices are.  For years, I’ve flowed in and out of certain habits.  Journaling is helpful sometimes, but usually after a month or so I tire of it or (more usually) tap out whatever guide I’m using and can’t quite get into the spirit of another one.  I never return to what I write, anyhow.  If I do reread my journals, I find myself wondering who the person was who wrote “that.”  It always feels unfamiliar, like stepping into the life of someone I know only from the news or TV.  The scene is familiar, but everything else seems foreign.  I love quiet, but sitting still isn’t my cup of tea unless I’m reading or on the computer, so meditation and prayer are a challenge.  For a long time, I’ve felt pretty heavy guilt about the irregularity and (might I say?) undisciplined nature of my spiritual practices.  Hit or miss, nothing like some of the people I admire so much who have doggedly pushed their way through the entirety of the Bible every year for decades or those who pray every morning.  Despite my admiration, I just can’t do that.  It simply isn’t who I am. 

But recently I’ve been trying to think about my own sense of spiritual practice differently.  I realized that the language we use about prayer and other disciplines is that of “fitness,” as though if we simply find the exercise that will “work” best in our own life and stick to it, our holiness muscles will be strong and toned, the solution to accessing God found through sheer sweat and self-will.  Discipline.  Well, I think there is certainly some very serious truth to this way of viewing spirituality… after all, if you don’t show up, it’s quite unlikely you’ll be doing very much listening to God, and practice does make perfection, after a fashion.  I remember, for example, a time when I really made a commitment to journal daily during Lent a few years ago.  The first weeks were painful.  I hated sitting there, attempting to speak to God and be silent so that God could speak to me.  But over that forty days, I became more able to wait patiently with my pen, not so sure of the truth of what I was saying, had a growing willingness to question my own assumptions about the things I was reading and thinking.  I felt guided.  A growing sense of peace about things I couldn’t control settled over me as I started to recognize patterns in my prayers and complaints.  But then, Lent ended and so did my commitment. 

So fitness might be a helpful metaphor… but I also think it limits how I think about what it means to live out my faith, using spiritual disciplines as a way to learn more about God and my relationship to God.  One of the 88 million websites (I confess, I didn’t keep track of which) said this, which I find enlightening:

“These disciplines can’t save you; they can’t even make you a holy person. But they can heighten your desire, awareness, and love of God by stripping down the barriers that you put up within yourself and some that others put up for you. What makes something a ‘spiritual discipline’ is that it takes a specific part of your way of life and turns it toward God. A spiritual discipline is, when practiced faithfully and regularly, a habit or regular pattern in your life that repeatedly brings you back to God and opens you up to what God is saying to you.”

Reading that, and thinking about what my spiritual life looks like right now, I realize that there are a number of wonderful things I’m a part of that absolutely “count” as spiritual disciplines, despite the fact that I don’t practice them daily and they aren’t on any “official” lists.  They are, yet and still, patterns in my life that do turn my heart and thoughts toward God and change the focus of the lens through which I view the world. 

  • Reading a variety of newspapers from around the globe
  • Putting myself in the presence of people who are deeply different from myself, either in opinion or experience
  • Noticing the beauty of the world, whether it’s in nature or the lives of other people
  • Taking joy in random moments, and not resisting my own spontaneous response to – a song on the radio, hearing a child laugh on the street, those times when a conversation with a friend is exactly the right thing at the right time
  • Spending time with people who have a deep connection with the holy or who have a generosity and openness of spirit
  • Writing this blog
  • Doing justice – making daily choices, as much as possible, with the well-being of other people across the world in mind, advocating for causes in line with my faith, living simply
  • Doing household chores.  This is one time when I really do pray.  God and I talk better when I’m doing dishes or making dinner or washing windows.  The physical activity seems to busy my mind in such a way that God can bypass all of the junk floating through my head the rest of the day. 

All of these things are ways I live my life.  They permeate my experience of the world and of God, and they help me listen more fully.  They aren’t an hour a day with my Bible.  They certainly do not make me holy and aren’t saving me on their own.  But each of them breaks down the barriers between myself and God and other people and God’s Creation.  They bring me back to God and remind me of all the mundane places where God is, all the daily things that in fact are sacred. 

I wonder, having read this, if you have anything similar in your own life?  One of the things I’ve found during my time in seminary is that we simply don’t talk about what our spiritual disciplines are – a vast majority of us (90% of Americans) say we pray, but what does that look like?  How do you practice spirituality?  What patterns turn you toward God?  How are you listening?

The God I worship

I know we’re always trying to figure out who we are, but it’s only been while I’ve been in school that I’ve let this consume my time in an intentional way.  Writing for class, for ordination candidacy, for personal reflection, it’s become more and more obvious to me that pinning down the “I” of a person is nearly impossible.  It’s only in what we value that our shimmery definitions come clear.  The patterns are important, the places we find beautiful despite horror or incredible despite simplicity.  I know that from one day to the next, someone might see me as interesting, as boring, as angry, as cheerful, as faithful, as broken, as good or bad, lovely or hateful, just or cruel.  And it’s all true.  The center of who any of us is doesn’t change because that Center is eternal.  And so I suppose it is the God we worship, our sense of the divine, that exposes our true selves, provides a frame for who we are, rather than lists of genealogies or chronologies, virtues or vices, beliefs or actions.  Let me introduce you to that God in my life, so that perhaps you can know me:  I worship the God of stairwells where children hide while parents fight.  The deity of fantasy novels, of Ecclesiastes, of Hedwig and the Angry Inch, of Rainer Maria Rilke.  I worship the Creator of neon purple and Mark Rothko and the scent of Meier lemons and cumin and gardenia.  I stand in awe of the God of sweet baby ankles… punk rock and cello …the Latin mass and relentless protesters of injustice.  It is the God who wove the many strands of my life, of the miscellaneous, wonderful, and painful people from whom I am the total concentrate, who I revere.  Who is God to you?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.