Posts Tagged ‘sin’

Reading Julian, knowing all will be well.

dame-julian-of-norwich-21

Something mysterious happens when I read Julian of Norwich’s Showings.  Somehow, despite more than six hundred years and an ocean separating us, I hear her voice.  Her visions, those vivid, living, sense- and image-drenched encounters with Jesus Christ, have a body of their own, and it finds its breath through Julian.  Her voice, speaking them into existence at God’s urging, permeates the text.  Sitting with her words, they reverberate through me as though she sits nearby, hand on my cheek, speaking directly to my life.  That is one of the powers of Julian’s words: they are at once available to every person and personally transformative.
Because of this sense of Julian’s real presence in these texts, I wondered what it would be like to hear them read aloud.  I imagined the way breath, time, and the rhythm of the human voice, a woman’s voice, would change the meaning and influence of the words.  Indeed, it seemed to me that the Showings are only truly accessible when lined out into a less prosaic form, allowing Julian’s own pauses and inflections to bubble to the surface.  Her text is musical, and so I have also set it to music, hoping that the setting will bring forward new meanings and opportunities for new meditation.  As the first female writer in the English language, the fact and being of Julian’s language itself seems intrinsic to its meaning and purpose, and to ignore this significant fact misses some important aspect Julian’s reflections.  They are, after all, not simply a sharing of unalloyed words from God, but filtered through twenty years of personal reflection from a very particular cultural and personal context.  Julian as an individual, as a woman in 14th century Norwich, as an anchoress, as a survivor of a difficult political, economic, and social reality, as a representative of the Church, as a mystic… all of these parts of her personality influence the meaning of her words.  They are personal, and meant for persons.
So many of these words focus on sin and salvation that I chose, in the spirit of Julian’s own concern with the very immediate pastoral dilemma of how we are to have hope in this world of obvious brokenness, to explore and choose texts for the reading that will guide us, her listeners, through a wandering in the wilderness toward the other side, to where all is well.  We begin with sin, with pain and suffering.  We end with the mystery of all being well, with God’s comfort, with not only the possibility of but the guarantee of God’s love, of healing and wholeness.  Human beings find love in relationship.  It is my hope that in hearing Julian’s words rather than merely reading them, we will be in relationship with her and feel the love she had for her “even Christians,” her fellows on the journey.  More than that, I hope that through Julian’s words, set to music and read to us as a story, as though we were her children, we will know ourselves once again to be children of God, looking to our Mother Christ for comfort under Julian’s guidance.

To listen to this half-hour podcast, click here or follow the link at the top of this post.

You’re not naked.

Things come together.  They just do.  Yesterday morning, catching up on my feed reader, I was happy to see that one of my favorite blogs had posted #512: Thinking You’re Naked.  Oh, good title, I thought.  Then I read it (go ahead, you read it, then come back.  I’ll wait.)

And was thrown to the floor.  I needed to hear it, shared it with friends, found that they, too, desperately needed those words.  Who told you you’re naked?  So the day before, writing about sin and suffering for my Julian of Norwich class, I had read this passage from her Showings, “I saw that [God] is everything which is good and comforting for our help. He is our clothing, who wraps and enfolds us for love, embraces us and shelters us, surrounds us for his love, which is so tender that he may never desert us.”  Who told you that you’re naked?  Who?

The last year or so has been one of learning about sin.  I’ve always been pretty good, as we all are perhaps, at noticing other people’s sin.  By sin, I mean the ways in which they are *obviously* not in alignment with who I think God wants them to be… right? Nah.  More likely, with who I think I want them to be.  But, writing this paper, exploring, diving, drowning in Julian’s words of comfort and courageous challenge, I came to some understanding of what I’ve struggled with this year.  A heart-knowledge, not a head one.  For the first time, I felt like I was really worth something despite my faults, my errors, my intentional mistakes and unintentional hurts.  My sins against myself and the damage I have inflicted on others.
I read this:  “And so, in all this contemplation it seemed to me that it was necessary to see and to know that we are sinners and commit many evil deeds which we ought to forsake, and leave many good deeds undone which we ought to do, so that we deserve pain, blame, and wrath.”  Um, yeah.  That’s about right, I thought.  I’m unworthy, I’ll never get there, I’m not enough… I’ve got to admit as much as I hate the word, I’m a sinner alright.  And don’t we, when we’re “bad” deserve to be punished?  Don’t people, doesn’t God, have full justification for being terribly angry with us when we’re wrong?
Except, I kept reading (always a mistake): “And despite all this, I saw truly that our Lord was never angry, and never will be.  Because he is God, he is good, he is truth, he is love, he is peace; and his power, his wisdom, his charity and his unity do not allow him to be angry… God is that goodness which cannot be angry, for God is nothing but goodness.”
Uh, what?  I’m sorry, but this just doesn’t compute with… well, what I want to be true.  Is that weird, not to want God to be that good, that loving, that generous?  If God is, then I have to let go of some things, some stuff I’ve been carrying around that I’ve gotten pretty used to over time.  It’s gotten fitted to me, like an old coat or a familiar hat.  Except it seems that Julian, and God through her, are telling me that those aren’t the clothes I’m supposed to be wearing.  I’ve put on the wrong stuff.  Not only have I thought that I was naked, in seeing myself that way, I’ve tried to cover myself inappropriately.  Maybe I’ve been protecting myself from God’s anger, putting on what amounts to spiritual chainmail, when God wants me to wrap myself in God’s own warm, loving arms.  We all do it.  But whoever told you that you’re naked, and whatever you’ve done to try to hide it, know this: God is our clothing and our shelter, and will never desert us, no matter how naked we feel.

The really big words.

Sin. Evil. Justice. Redemption. Salvation. I’ve got to admit, even after a significant amount of seminary, I’m not entirely sure what it is we’re talking about when we use these words.  Sure, any one of us could take a vigorous stab at them, talk around them, maybe even rattle off a definition or two, thanks to lectures and chapters tucked away in the dusty recesses of our minds. Some of us will need to do much better even than that when faced with our ordination boards.   Actually, before I came to school, I probably had an easier time of it, defining what these concepts mean.  But I look at them now, and instead of feeling confident in my knowledge, it’s like a mist has floated across my vision and I can’t tell what I’m looking at.  

I’ve been asked by my internship supervisor to reflect on and attempt to answer for our next meeting, “What are the connections between evil, suffering, social justice, redemption, and salvation for you?  How do these understandings shape you as a minister?  How does this inform your interaction with other people?”  I’ll be honest, I put “think about deep stuff” on my to-do list, “due next week,” and left it there.  And now it’s hovering over me, edging in on my thinking and my reading and my time, waiting for me to notice it tugging on my pant leg, asking for attention.   I know there are connections.  I even know that they’re important, central, essential, to how I see the world and live within it.  These aren’t questions you just ask as an academic or professional exercise – we ask them all the time, with every important life decision we make, every time we watch the news or see a film or hear about the death or illness of someone who has touched our lives.  

I suppose the only way I can begin to think and feel around this problem is to ask myself, “What makes me question that God exists? And what gives me some certainty that, in fact, God does exist and is, further yet, good, despite those questions?”  I have to confess, a lesson I’ve learned quite well recently is that evil, or badness that hurts other people and the world and is opposed to who we know God to be, is rather harder to point out than I’d thought before.  I’ve learned quite well that sometimes good people do pretty awful and hurtful things, while “bad” people pretty regularly do kind and generous ones.  I hesitate to call any person “evil.”  Sinful, now that’s a different story altogether.  It seems like pretty much every one of us walks away from what we know is right, often intentionally, with some regularity.  Willfulness, even.  Panache.  Intention.  There are times, specific choices I’ve made, when in my mind I’ve walked in a particular direction, making a very specific choice, and imagined myself sticking my tongue out at God.  ”Nanana-nanana.  You can’t stop me, just watch this.”  But I suppose that’s part of the answer to the question, isn’t it?  The fact that I can intentionally choose, in a moment of pique or misguided independence to give my Creator, the maker of the universe, the spiritual finger… and yet still exist, be allowed to learn from it, is grace indeed.  Justice is the correction of it, the hard realization of how stupid or cruel or inhuman I looked while doing it.  The pain of realizing how far off I was.  The shame of it.

I’ve worked in the area of relationship violence for a while, beginning with my first year in college.  At first, I got involved with rape crisis because I was lonely, away from home for school, and thought that the girls in National Organization for Women, a club associated with the rape crisis facilitators’ group, were cool and might make good friends.  I was a pretty vanilla kid from nowhere Ohio, and they were (it appeared to me) cosmopolitan, hip, interesting women whose innate coolness might with some luck rub off on me.  My selfish motives led me into a career where I actually found value, deep friendships, meaning, and excitement, as well as a developing understanding that there are many ways human beings like to hurt one another, as well as diverse and incredible ways they find to survive and discover beauty in the ugliness of living.  It led me back to church, and it dragged me to my utter surprise into recognizing a call to ministry.  Now, that’s gotta be redemption.  Out of my selfishness and deep loneliness, my lack of self-identity and confidence, God made a way for me to live with meaning.  

Further yet, out of the times when I’ve strayed away from the way, making terribly destructive personal choices or making apparently good decisions out of intensely selfish motivations or striving to enforce my own fickle will on mapping the direction of that path, God’s still somehow been able to bring me back.  Not always to the same place I would have been before, but somewhere for my good.  Like Tim Gunn says, God “makes it work.”  This gives me hope for the people in my life who make me want, even need, to believe in hell, in a place where the baddies suffer.  If God’s looking out for this vanilla girl with no apparent magically special characteristics or goals, watching what I’m doing and paying enough attention that I’m getting guided and helped along my stumbling way, then I absolutely have to believe that the same God’s got an eye on the ones who are doing serious damage to themselves and others even beyond what I’ve been capable of so far.  Gotta believe it.  Which means they’re getting second and third chances, too.  I hope it’s true.  I think it must be.  It seems as though our motivations don’t really matter much to God… just that we’re human and somehow mysteriously special.  And that, friends, is salvation.

Sins of the father.

All day, I’ve been dreading writing – perhaps it was the neon red “priority” highlight on this item of my to-do list, or the fact that I’ve already spent more than 8 hours on the computer today.  Maybe it’s the fact that the weather was gorgeous and my heart felt a bit raw from too much reflection and busy-life-stuff.  Maybe it was chapel Thursday.  I think that was probably it.  A few friends and I hosted the last worship service of the week at school on Thursday.  The service we offered was based on one designed by Peter Rollins, an emergent church theologian at Ikon Community in Belfast, Ireland.  It was titled, “Sins of the Father,” and offered worshipers the opportunity to, simply, be angry with God.  It asked these questions: Is our faith radical enough, is it passionate enough, to embrace and acknowledge our anger at God? Must our relationship with God always be friendly and comforting or can we dare to confront, demand  and shake our fists at God? Could, perhaps, a violent reaction against God signal a close and authentic experience of God’s presence?  I won’t bore you with details, but it was stunningly beautiful to see how visual media, old-church ritual (most of it turned on its head), and music could come together to create a space where it was not only safe to be horrified at God, to expose our deep wounds that find their source in our inability to understand how God can be good and also allow, well, what is allowed… but expected to do so. 

The centerpiece of the service was the opportunity for each person present to write on a slip of paper (or 2, or 5) the ways in which God had offended against them, the ways they were shaking their fist in God’s face.  I could sum them up as saying, “HOW COULD YOU?”  Each paper, unless marked with an X, was read anonymously but out loud and then burnt, offered like a sacrifice in the Temple, the smoke curling up toward the chapel ceiling.  As I faced my peers, professors, and friends, reading their pain outloud, there settled over my shoulders a deep sense of quietude and holiness.  The pile was large. I found myself slowing down after about a dozen slips because my heart simply didn’t want to read the next complaint, knowing that there would be no sweetness, nothing to break the monotony of brokenness, fear, and anxiety.  But as I read things like, “my mom’s health,” “AIDS, world war, destruction, global warming,” “child abuse,” “debt,” and “your silence is deafening,” held them to that candle flame and watched them burn down to my finger tips, it was obvious that this was the most priestly act I had ever done.  I am a lover of the Eucharist.  The open table, the banquet of the Kingdom open and ready for any to share, is a central feature of my understanding of God and God’s reality.  There is a bounteous generosity, a provision of abundance, openness, and inclusion that cannot be diminished by any human act.  The bread and cup are evidence of the brokenness of the world, but also of its hope for reconciliation.  But that smoke, those terrible words on those tiny, fragile slips of paper… they were a Eucharist, too.  So, as I continue to think about this experience, the holiness of it, the weight of it, I know that God can carry its heaviness, but I wonder if we can continue to sit in the discomfort and tension of the question… Can we stay in love with God and feel this devastation? 

The final word offered during the service was not a neat answer, but I think it is one of comfort.  “For now, all we can comfort ourselves with is the possibility that the God we accuse is a God our our own creation… our own creation which subsequently makes demands on us.”  This is not to imply that the service ends with the sense that God does not exist, but rather, the God we with whom we are angry is not really God.  The God of Creation, not of our creation, is far more mysterious, complex, wonderful, and (likely) more difficult.  In some way, this scares me.  In another, it absolutely must be true in order for me to be faithful, since I confess that the God with whom I am angry is one who is not worthy even to hear my lamentation.  And so I will hope, and I will pray for each one of the angry, sad, and broken accusations offered on Thursday.  I will pray that God will hear them and will do something magnificently generous to heal them.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.